- From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2001 10:01:38 +0200 (CEST)
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Dan, I think that specifying an abstract SOAP data model won't
help us with this particular issue because the issue is not about
what the data means, it's about how the data is written (the data
meaning information about arrays).
Jacek Kopecky
Idoox
http://www.idoox.com/
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Dan Brickley wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com wrote:
>
> > +1 to Jacek's issue.
>
> > [...] I agree that more explicit markup would be appropriate.
>
> > * Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com> [2001-10-04 11:38+0200]
> > > New:
> > >
> > > #xx "array information is not XML-ish"
> >
> > xx = 144:
> > http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/xmlp-issues.html#x144
>
> Am I right in expecting the placeholder 'SOAP data model' section of the
> new 1.2 spec to help here? Will it articulate a common abstraction
> (including lists etc.) to which our different syntactic encodings
> (verbose markup vs structured strings) will map?
>
> Dan
>
>
Received on Monday, 15 October 2001 04:01:55 UTC