W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2001

RE: SOAP-Attachment question -> handling large attachment?

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 16:15:41 -0700
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D034422A9@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Shuo Shen" <sshen@softartisans.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Not to contradict what John said about SOAP with attachment, just for
the fun of it you might also want to have a look at DIME

	http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/xml_wsspecs/dime/default.htm

Henrik

>Specifically, we suggest about two ways:
>1. Adding a http-like Content-Disposition header to each body 
>part, which will have sth like:
>
>--MIME_boundary
>Content-Type: image/tiff
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
>Content-ID: <claim061400a.tiff@claiming-it.com>
>Content-Disposition: attachment-data; name="attachment1"; 
>filename="foo.tif""
>
>so we know we can persist the following data to a file anyway 
>no matter the size;
>
>2. Or adding a Content-Length or Attachment-Length header for 
>each body part
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2001 19:16:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT