- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 17:05:44 -0400 (EDT)
- To: peter.hendry@capeclear.com (Pete Hendry)
- Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Heh, well rather than open up this one again, I'll just point out a thread that already covered the discussion; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Jun/0015.html For some more context about why I believe 500 is the right choice, see; http://www.markbaker.ca/2001/07/SoapUses/ http://internet.conveyor.com/RESTwiki/moin.cgi/SoapFaultsShouldNotUseThe200ResponseCode FWIW, if SOAP were only used for RPC, and HTTP was only used as a transport protocol, 200 would be a better response code. MB
Received on Monday, 8 October 2001 17:03:04 UTC