Re: Issue 140 bogus?

+1


Jacek Kopecky wrote:
> 
>  Stuart,
>  I like this version best, and this version is IMHO even better
> suited for the spec than for the primer.
> 
>                             Jacek Kopecky
> 
>                             Idoox
>                             http://www.idoox.com/
> 
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Williams, Stuart wrote:
> 
>  > Hi Jacek,
>  >
>  > Following todays telcon I thought that I would reformulate the proposal I
>  > had for closing Issue 140 into a single informative sentence, avoiding MAY
>  > (and may), targetted for inclusion in Part 1 Section 4.2.2 either
>  > immediately before or after the current last paragraph of that section:
>  >
>  > "A SOAP Node determines whether it plays a particular actor role with
>  > respect to a particular message being processed based on an number of
>  > factors including, but not restricted to (and in no particular order): local
>  > configuration information; the receiving transport endpoint address; the
>  > message content; other implemenation dependent factors."
>  >
>  > I continue to have a preference that the spec. say something informative
>  > like this, however I could live with a resolution that required information
>  > the determination of aactor role be presented in the primer.
>  >
>  > Best regards
>  >
>  > Stuart
>  >