W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > October 2001

RE: Issue 140 bogus?

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 00:16:12 +0200 (CEST)
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0110040013290.25445-100000@mail.idoox.com>
 I like this version best, and this version is IMHO even better
suited for the spec than for the primer.

                            Jacek Kopecky


On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Williams, Stuart wrote:

 > Hi Jacek,
 > Following todays telcon I thought that I would reformulate the proposal I
 > had for closing Issue 140 into a single informative sentence, avoiding MAY
 > (and may), targetted for inclusion in Part 1 Section 4.2.2 either
 > immediately before or after the current last paragraph of that section:
 > "A SOAP Node determines whether it plays a particular actor role with
 > respect to a particular message being processed based on an number of
 > factors including, but not restricted to (and in no particular order): local
 > configuration information; the receiving transport endpoint address; the
 > message content; other implemenation dependent factors."
 > I continue to have a preference that the spec. say something informative
 > like this, however I could live with a resolution that required information
 > the determination of aactor role be presented in the primer.
 > Best regards
 > Stuart
Received on Wednesday, 3 October 2001 18:16:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC