In the section entitled "Introduction to the SOAP Binding Framework", para 2: The last statement allows different transports on different message hops. However, in the case of an end-to-end security association an assumption is made about the willingness of an intermediary to accept this message even if it is unwilling or unable to do participate. I propose adding the following text at the end of that paragraph: An intermediary MUST generate a SOAP fault if it is not able to accept a SOAP message without violating existing end-to-end conditions of the message. ---RajReceived on Tuesday, 27 November 2001 22:19:09 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT