W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks

From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:58:06 -0500
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com>
Cc: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>, "Noah Mendelsohn" <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, <frystyk@microsoft.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>, <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>
Message-ID: <OFF49A5074.9F420941-ON85256B10.0064726C@raleigh.ibm.com >
Jean-Jacques' example:
>  <envelope>
>    <header>
>      <xx:user
>          href="#example.org"
>          actor="next"><name>fred</name></xx:user>
>      <yy:company
>          mU="true"
>          id="example.org"
>          actor="none"><name>Example Org</name></yy:company>
>    </header>
>    <body>...</>
>  </envelope>

  You've said that the encoding rules are separate from
the processing model rules - however, doesn't it seem
in consistent to say that for encoding (issue 171) we
should ignore the attributes on the 1st header, but for
the processing model we should NOT ignore them and instead
ignore the attributes on the 2nd header?  I would prefer
a more consistent design.

Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 15:58:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:16 UTC