W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

RE: counterproposal on issue #144

From: Murali Janakiraman <murali@roguewave.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:33:28 -0800
Message-ID: <F888C30C3021D411B9DA00B0D0209BE8014F44A4@cvo-exchange.roguewave.com>
To: "'Alan Kent'" <ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au>, xml-dist-app@w3.org

> From Jacke
>  So yes, removing ptas from SOAP Encoding is a viable solution,
> after all. I think I can propose that as a counterproposal to my
> original proposal (ooops, too much proposing here). It means
> making array serialization rules about half as complex with no
> philosophical issues.

>> From Alan
>>***YES!*** Exactly what I had in mind. Keep the spec simple with
>>absolutely no loss of power. You just do p-t-a's differently.

>>>Murali

 Yes but with one small difference. You have got to do it using your own
format, under your own encoding style which translates into interoperability
issues. 

Murali
Received on Tuesday, 20 November 2001 19:34:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT