RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution

For various reasons we did that in HTTP and it caused even bigger
problems down the line - let's not go there :)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen
mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com

>There is another choice:
>d) Get rid of actor and make all processing based on the acceptance
>   of the contract specified by the QName of the block.  This removes
>   this pseudo targeting that seems to be causing so many problems.
>   Everything is a black box anyway - so the QName should be the
>   determining factor.  We can get the semantics of actor="next"
>   other ways...
>:-)