W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

RE: Issue 146 proposed resolution

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 09:36:25 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D0580194B@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

No, there is only one default/anonymous actor. It may, however, not be
possible to determine who that node is until the message arrives at the
node. The formulation that I suggested did not (at least not
intentionally) indicate that there are more than one default/anonymous
actor.

>Agreed.   The question in my mind is, exactly how do we model it. As I 
>understand Henrik, he is saying:  "there can be two nodes (and I mean 
>"node" in exactly the formal sense of chapter 2) in the path 
>taken by a 
>given message both of which act in the role of the anonymous actor, 
>neither of which is considered an intermediary;  nonetheless, 
>the first 
>one of these relays (again in the formal sense of "relay" per 
>chapter 2) 
>the message to the second.

Henrik
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 12:37:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT