W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Proposed resolution of issue 101: relationship between header and body blocks

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:01:20 +0100
Message-ID: <3BF39270.CAE73A55@crf.canon.fr>
To: Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com, dug@us.ibm.com, frystyk@microsoft.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org, ruellan@crf.canon.fr
Oops... a word went missing... I meant to say (missing text >>highligthed<<):
    "Is an intermediary supposed to abort processing if it finds a non-mU header block that references an
mU header block >>targetted at none<< it does not understand (i.e. is section 2.5 meant to be recursive?)?

Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:

> [...] Is an intermediary supposed to abort processing if it finds a non-mU
> header block that references an mU header block it does not understand (i.e. is section 2.5 meant to be
> recursive?)?
>
> Jean-Jacques.
Received on Thursday, 15 November 2001 05:03:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:04 GMT