W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2001

Re: An analysis of mustUnderstand and related issues

From: duglin <duglin@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 22:54:18 -0400
Message-ID: <04f901c0e58f$28ff06e0$0600a8c0@dugpad1>
To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

Didn't say MU's can appear on the body.  The spec say:
   A body entry is semantically equivalent to a header entry 
    intended for the default actor and with a SOAP 
   mustUnderstand attribute with a value of "1".
-Dug

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@zolera.com>
To: "duglin" <duglin@yahoo.com>
Cc: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: An analysis of mustUnderstand and related issues


> > 1 - Because bodies are the same as headers targeted
> > for the ultimate destination with an implicit
> > MU flag on we need to make sure that when we
> > check that all MU headers can be understood that
> > we include the body in that list.
> 
> Whoah.  mustUnderstand can appear on the Body?   I suppose that's
> allowed because of the "body is just a header" escape hatch, but if so,
> that is some serious reading between the lines.  If so, then the spec
> needs real clarification.
> /r$


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Friday, 25 May 2001 22:53:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT