- From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 21:18:47 -0700
- To: "Doug Davis" <dug@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Didn't we already have this discussion? It seems to be the same question that you asked in [1]. If so then my answer is still [2]. Listen, we have roughly 90 issues and counting that we need to address. We have to keep moving. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Apr/0148.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Apr/0156.html Henrik Frystyk Nielsen mailto:henrikn@microsoft.com http://magnet >I guess I'd like to know what would be missing from SOAP >if the SOAPAction header did go away? What would services, >firewalls...(whatever) not be able to do through some other >means? (And by some other means I mean in some means that is >at least a little bit natural and not convoluted) You surely >could a message as a SOAP messages (and give it a hint) >through the use of content-types and/or through the request- >URI, right? So what would be missing? -Dug
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2001 01:08:15 UTC