Re: Must understand mustUnderstand proposal

> In particular, I don't see anything that
>prevents processing such a header after the body, and certainly nothing
>that prevents processing it just because it is unreferenced.  Did I miss
>something?.

I think its important to make a distinction between a new XMLP processor
processing a header after the body is processed and a header being
processed after the body within a single XMLP processor.  I believe the
1st case is invalid because you're talking about a processor that comes
after the ultimate destination - while the 2nd one is all processed within
the ultimate destination.
-Dug