- From: Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 12:35:57 -0500
- To: <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
> I would imagine that you would still want to say that it is ebXML stuff > regardless of whether there is a body or not, no? That is, you would > still want to use a shared ebXML identifier that is the same as for > other ebXML messages? Most definitely. Dick Brooks Group 8760 110 12th Street North Birmingham, AL 35203 dick@8760.com 205-250-8053 Fax: 205-250-8057 http://www.8760.com/ InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:frystyk@microsoft.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:24 PM > To: 'Dick Brooks'; Martin Gudgin; XML Protocol Comments > Subject: RE: SOAPAction Proposal > > > > >There are cases in ebXML where the body contains no child > >elements. I presume that other SOAP message will also contain > >empty Body elements. In these cases would the SOAPAction contain "". > > I would imagine that you would still want to say that it is ebXML stuff > regardless of whether there is a body or not, no? That is, you would > still want to use a shared ebXML identifier that is the same as for > other ebXML messages? > > Henrik
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 13:37:23 UTC