W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2001

RE: SOAPAction Proposal

From: Dick Brooks <dick@8760.com>
Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 12:35:57 -0500
To: <frystyk@microsoft.com>, "Martin Gudgin" <marting@develop.com>, "XML Protocol Comments" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIOBLMLCDOHCHIKMGOEAEFNAA.dick@8760.com>
> I would imagine that you would still want to say that it is ebXML stuff
> regardless of whether there is a body or not, no? That is, you would
> still want to use a shared ebXML identifier that is the same as for
> other ebXML messages?

Most definitely.

Dick Brooks
Group 8760
110 12th Street North
Birmingham, AL 35203
dick@8760.com
205-250-8053
Fax: 205-250-8057
http://www.8760.com/

InsideAgent - Empowering e-commerce solutions 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen [mailto:frystyk@microsoft.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 12:24 PM
> To: 'Dick Brooks'; Martin Gudgin; XML Protocol Comments
> Subject: RE: SOAPAction Proposal
> 
> 
> 
> >There are cases in ebXML where the body contains no child 
> >elements. I presume that other SOAP message will also contain 
> >empty Body elements. In these cases would the SOAPAction contain "".
> 
> I would imagine that you would still want to say that it is ebXML stuff
> regardless of whether there is a body or not, no? That is, you would
> still want to use a shared ebXML identifier that is the same as for
> other ebXML messages?
> 
> Henrik
Received on Thursday, 3 May 2001 13:37:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT