W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2001

Re: Correlation [was: Transaction IDs]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:03:07 -0800
To: "Orchard, David" <dorchard@jamcracker.com>
Cc: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, "'frystyk@microsoft.com'" <frystyk@microsoft.com>, XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010322140259.A18955@akamai.com>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2001 at 04:35:35PM -0500, Orchard, David wrote:
> 
> My counter paragraph in the straw-man is 
> 
> Explicit correlation is provided by a Module. The definition of a default
> mechanism is in scope for XML Protocol. Explicit correlation may be used
> over transport bindings with implicit correlations, in which case it
> overrides implicit correlation of the messages, from XMLP's view.

No objection from me; the important thing IMHO is that it's a Module.


> www.jamcracker.com - Sounds like a job for Jamcracker.

Does this imply that you'll write the Module specification? ;)

Cheers,

-- 
Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist
Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2001 17:03:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:59 GMT