W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > March 2001

RE: RPC -- is it a module. One last try.

From: Eugene Kuznetsov <eugene@datapower.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 19:18:10 -0500
To: "Ray Whitmer" <rayw@netscape.com>, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@akamai.com>
Cc: "marwan sabbouh" <ms@mitre.org>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBLGLOJMHANDPKJOCOGEGEDDAA.eugene@datapower.com>

> Are modules permitted to extend the fault codes, should we have extra 
> fault codes in the core for RPC, or should we ignore these added 
> failures for an RPC module such as missing a required argument?

In general, it seems desirable that they be extensible.

\\ Eugene Kuznetsov
\\ eugene@datapower.com
\\ DataPower Technology, Inc.
Received on Tuesday, 20 March 2001 19:16:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:12 UTC