> (I am also wondering why the usual > QName+actor dispatching mechanism does not work here.) > > > <SOAP-ENV:Body > > SOAP-ENV:encodingStyle="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/"/> > > <SOAP-ENC:int id="i1" SOAP-ENC:root='0'>34.5</SOAP-ENC:int> > > <m:GetLastTradePriceResponse xmlns:m="Some-URI"> > > <PriceAndVolume> > > <LastTradePrice href="#i1"/> > > <DayVolume>10000</DayVolume> > > </PriceAndVolume> > > </m:GetLastTradePriceResponse> > > </SOAP-ENV:Body> > > Jean-Jacques. It would work for the request message, but it won't work for the response message (right??), since the QName of the response element can be anything: "The name of the return value accessor is not significant. Likewise, the name of the struct is not significant. However, a convention is to name it after the method name with the string "Response" appended." So, if I have even one multi-ref element in the Body of a response message, I won't be able to distinguish between it and the response element. FReceived on Friday, 15 June 2001 18:51:14 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:44 GMT