On Fri 6/15/2001 3:45 AM -0500 Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote: >Hi Jerry, > >Maybe another solution would be to use multiple headers? > >Anyone thinking this violates the spec? > >Jean-Jacques. > >jerry_liu@exch.labs.agilent.com wrote: >> [...] I have a need to batch multiple SOAP messages within a single >> HTTP request (or response). (Long story as to why but basically some of the >> message receivers in the system are not always available and we need to >> queue SOAP messages destined for them.) I suppose one way to do it is to >> just hide multiple RPC invocations inside the one parent one, though that >> seems inelegant to me. A method I like better is to just use MIME multipart >> to send mutliple SOAP envelopes. Seems much cleaner and elegant to do it >> this way. [...] "Violates" is probably too strong. However, such a way of using HTTP would IMO challenge the viability of the HTTP binding currently in SOAP1.1. BTW, how could you use "SOAPAction" in such a case? Regards, DavidReceived on Friday, 15 June 2001 07:44:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:44 GMT