W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > June 2001

Re: Issue 25 Proposal

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:27:11 +0200
Message-ID: <3B29B8CE.7991A694@crf.canon.fr>
To: jones@research.att.com
CC: jacek@idoox.com, ruellan@crf.canon.fr, xml-dist-app@w3.org
jones@research.att.com wrote:

> It seems to me that the options are:
> 1) trailers are not blocks but are referenceable elements
>    (keep in mind that header blocks can also function simply
>     as referenced blocks)
> 2) trailers are targettable blocks but must have mU=0
> 3) trailers are just like header blocks (targettable and can have mU=1)
>
> [...] I'm not sure whether I prefer 1) or 2), but I think it would be a
> mistake to adopt 3).

Could you elaborate on why it would be a mistake to adopt 3) ?

Jean-Jacques.
Received on Friday, 15 June 2001 03:27:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:01 GMT