> My smaller list adapted from yours would be: > - transport protocol used: > HTTP/1.1, SMTP, BEEP, etc; how to use it. > I think that the SOAP/underlying protocols semantics relationship > would be explained here. > - encapsulation: > ranging from straight XML angle-bracketty serialization to MIME and > co, maybe compression, etc. > - MEPs supported: > one-way, request/reply, etc. > Implicit message correllation, for example, could fall into that > category. > > Hmmm... after writing that, I realize that my list is awfully small... Small is good... see my later proposal for http ;) -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Thursday, 26 July 2001 16:41:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT