W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2001

Re: RPCTF: Should RPC be core or an extension ?

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 13:13:48 -0400
Message-ID: <3B5EFE4C.F37648C0@zolera.com>
To: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
CC: John Ibbotson <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 to what Jacek wrote.

I supose this means that Sec5 should be moved into a separate document,
too? Or -- for interoperability purposes -- should we require all SOAP
implementations to understand sec5 encoding?

> +1 with Marc's change. I wasn't against visibly removing RPC from
> the core of SOAP, I just didn't like the term "extension" used
> here. 8-)

-- 
Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity
Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Dig-sig, Encryption
http://www.zolera.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2001 13:15:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:03 GMT