The list of differences is completely ridiculous. I can write tunnelling-oriented SOAP right now, and the only difference between what I use and your "application semantic" binding is whether faults come back using 500 or 200. > (**) A tunnel binding only requires a single bit of SOAP-identifying > information on an inbound message in order to unambigously identify > to a receiving implementation that a tunnel needs to be established. Not at all. It could be completely up to the local server configuration. I could write all my web services as CGI scripts and nobody would know. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption http://www.zolera.comReceived on Monday, 23 July 2001 11:00:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT