W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > July 2001

Re: Binding example discussion

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:29:13 -0700
To: christopher ferris <chris.ferris@east.sun.com>
Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Marc Hadley <marc.hadley@Sun.COM>, XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20010718112903.A24218@akamai.com>

On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 02:25:22PM -0400, christopher ferris wrote:
> Agreed. However, in the case of SOAP-RPC, or more precisely, the
> request/response MEP, the binding specification would need to say
> something to the effect that a 202 Accepted status code MUST NOT be
> returned.

Or, perhaps, that implicit correlation is available only when a SOAP
envelope is present in both the HTTP request and HTTP response

Mark Nottingham, Research Scientist
Akamai Technologies (San Mateo, CA USA)
Received on Wednesday, 18 July 2001 14:29:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:14 UTC