> Unfortunately, given the data-model-free nature of XML 1.0 and the > hairy complexity of fully-blown post-parse XML 1.0, abstract > infoset approaches are probably unavoidable - unless one goes > for commonXML, microXML or so other syntactic restriction of > XML 1.0. I don't understand the argument: I don't need a data model to implement a netowrk protocol. Nor am I alone, as there are a couple-dozen increasingly-interoperable SOAP implementations to further argue the point. (Not to mention the countless SAX and DOM implementations.) /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Your Key to Online Integrity Securing Web services: XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption http://www.zolera.comReceived on Thursday, 12 July 2001 13:21:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:02 GMT