This scenario assumes data is to be delivered from the sender to the receiver. Therefore there are two possible outcomes. Either the data was delivered or there was some failure. I think the scenario should be more prescriptive than the suggested changes. How about : DS5 A sender wishes to reliably exchange data with a receiver. It wishes to be notified of the status of the data delivery to the receiver. The status may take the form of: 1) The data has been successfully delivered to the receiver, or 2) Some failure has occurred which prevents the sucessful delivery to the receiver. instead of: DS5 A sender wishes to exchange data with a receiver. Data is sent from the sender to the receiver, and a positive acknowledgement is returned to the sender indicating a successful transfer. Note: DS5 differentiates from DS3 and DS4 in that an acknowledgement is semantically different from any business-level response which the receiver might send. The acknowledgement only indicates a successful transfer of the message from one node to another. XML Technology and Messaging, IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN Tel: (work) +44 (0)1962 815188 (home) +44 (0)1722 781271 Fax: +44 (0)1962 816898 Notes Id: John Ibbotson/UK/IBM email: john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.comReceived on Monday, 29 January 2001 15:18:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:58 GMT