Mark, >I think that the discussion at Redmond and on this list demonstrates there is >sufficient interest, and even alarm at the prospect that there may be some >gotchas if we don't carefully consider these "solutions proposed by other >groups" >and even recommend one that we know works well with the other mechanisms of XP >that we design. I would recommend that we give more visibility to this issue >in >the work of the committee, through a requirement if necessary, possibly through >an additional binding (MIME-multipart?) and certainly through usage >scenarios/use >cases. An issue with a MIME/multipart binding is that it implies that the envelope is still to be XML, and that MIME becomes just a wrapper, not the envelope. I believe the issue at hand is whether or not that's the best solution for our needs. MB -- Mark Baker, Sun Microsystems Ottawa, Ontario, CANADAReceived on Wednesday, 24 January 2001 21:40:48 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 12 October 2006 00:08:36 GMT