W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2001

Re: [R700b] Optional/mandatory bit (was: Comments on XML Protocol Reqs)

From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:14:44 -0500
Message-ID: <3A5CC2B4.79EE7CE2@canada.sun.com>
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
CC: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, Noah Mendelsohn <Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com>, Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:
> I don't think we would want this to be grokked by XP. On the other hand,
> it would seem possible to build this on top of XP as the single
> optional/mandatory means that we always have a well-defined processing
> model at the core.

FWIW, I agree with Henrik.  Let's use the extensibility we're building
into XP for our own benefit too.

MB
Received on Wednesday, 10 January 2001 15:14:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:58 GMT