W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > January 2001

RE: DR309 -- ongoing discussion

From: David Ezell <David_E3@Verifone.Com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 17:02:23 -0500
Message-ID: <472E220BA79DD11186340060B06B38D9033AD192@tpantmail1.ssr.hp.com>
To: "'Anderson, William L'" <WAnderson@crt.xerox.com>
Cc: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
On Tue 1/2/2001 4:55 PM -5:00 Bill Anderson wrote:

>"Following the example of XHTML Basic [1], XML Protocol supports
>_applications_ that work on resource constrained devices, including devices
>that do not support the feature set normally associated with XML processing

Actually, I think we need to stay with either "should work" or "must work"
for a consistent "requirement look and feel".  "Should" gives us more
wiggle room.  Thoughts?

Received on Tuesday, 2 January 2001 17:02:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:11 UTC