- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 19:43:08 -0500
- To: Pete Hendry <peter.hendry@capeclear.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> I would rather preempt this and define all basic types now. I think they are all there > except KeyValue (I can't think of any others I have needed on a regular basis). You have not responded to the counter-arguments that "array of structs containing (key, value) is good enough," and why you feel it is not okay to have that on a per-schema basis. In fact, the very point that you can define a KeyValue list on a per-schema basis can be seen as a proof that it's not a basic type. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption) http://www.zolera.com
Received on Thursday, 20 December 2001 19:42:24 UTC