> I would rather preempt this and define all basic types now. I think they are all there > except KeyValue (I can't think of any others I have needed on a regular basis). You have not responded to the counter-arguments that "array of structs containing (key, value) is good enough," and why you feel it is not okay to have that on a per-schema basis. In fact, the very point that you can define a KeyValue list on a per-schema basis can be seen as a proof that it's not a basic type. /r$ -- Zolera Systems, Securing web services (XML, SOAP, Signatures, Encryption) http://www.zolera.comReceived on Thursday, 20 December 2001 19:42:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT