W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2001

RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:29:46 -0800
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05CBCFA4@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>


>Hmm, is there any precedent for using QNAMEs in PCDATA?  I 
>know that they have been retrofitted into attribute values by 
>common practice, but I don't believe I've seen them as content before.

FWIW, SOAP fault codes currently uses qnames as values, see also [1].

Henrik

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#QName

Received on Monday, 17 December 2001 12:30:22 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen: "RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)"
Previous message: Scott Lawrence: "Re: SOAP IANA considerations"
Maybe in reply to: Marc Hadley: "Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)"
Next in thread: Mark Baker: "Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)"
Reply: Mark Baker: "Re: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes)"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:05 GMT