RE: Proposed Issue 173 Resolution (Hierarchical Fault Codes) from Henrik Frystyk Nielsen on 2001-12-17 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from December 2001)

From: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <henrikn@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:29:46 -0800
To: "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: "Marc Hadley" <marc.hadley@sun.com>, <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <79107D208BA38C45A4E45F62673A434D05CBCFA4@red-msg-07.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

>Hmm, is there any precedent for using QNAMEs in PCDATA?  I 
>know that they have been retrofitted into attribute values by 
>common practice, but I don't believe I've seen them as content before.

FWIW, SOAP fault codes currently uses qnames as values, see also [1].

Henrik

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#QName

Received on Monday, 17 December 2001 12:30:22 UTC