W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Proposed text for issue 155

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 13:22:24 -0500
Message-ID: <3C0E65E0.50102@sun.com>
To: "Williams, Stuart" <skw@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: "'Jacek Kopecky'" <jacek@systinet.com>, Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1

Williams, Stuart wrote:

> Dug,
> 
> A picky catch on the last sentence (which I know originates from the
> previous text):
> 
> 
>>The actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the
>>SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is targeted.
>>
> 
> Values carried in actor attribute information item denote 'roles', not SOAP
> Nodes directly. We might want to be clearer about that.
> 
> Stuart
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:jacek@systinet.com]
>>Sent: 04 December 2001 22:03
>>To: Doug Davis
>>Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org
>>Subject: Re: Proposed text for issue 155
>>
>>
>>+1. 8-)
>>
>>                   Jacek Kopecky
>>
>>                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
>>                   http://www.systinet.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, Doug Davis wrote:
>>
>> > oh, geez, no - I see how it can be taken that way, how about:
>> >
>> >   As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not all parts of a
>> >   SOAP message may be intented for the ultimate SOAP receiver. The
>> >   actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the
>> >   SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is targeted.
>> >
>> > -Dug
>> >
>> >
>> > Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com> on 12/04/2001 02:45:03 PM
>> >
>> > To:   Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
>> > cc:   <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
>> > Subject:  Re: Proposed text for issue 155
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >  Dug,
>> >  just a question for clarification:
>> >  Are you proposing here that the absence of the actor attribute
>> > equals the proposed semantics of the ".../any" actor?
>> >
>> >                    Jacek Kopecky
>> >
>> >                    Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
>> >                    http://www.systinet.com/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Doug Davis wrote:
>> >
>> >  > Section 4.2.2 states:
>> >  >   As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not 
>>all parts of a
>> >  >   SOAP message may be intended for the ultimate SOAP 
>>receiver. SOAP
>> >  >   defines an actor attribute information item that can 
>>be used to
>> >  >   indicate the SOAP node at which a particular SOAP 
>>header block is
>> >  >   targeted.
>> >  >
>> >  > I propose to change this to:
>> >  >   As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not 
>>all parts of a
>> >  >   SOAP message may be intented for the ultimate SOAP 
>>receiver. The
>> >  >   actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the
>> >  >   SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is 
>>targeted if
>> >  >   targeting of that header block is desired.
>> >  >
>> >  > Note 1: The "2" is a typo in the version of the spec I have :-)
>> >  > Note 2: This entire piece of text might be removed when issues
>> >  >         153 and 160 are resolved.
>> >  >
>> >  > -Dug
>> >  >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
> 
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2001 13:26:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 22:28:13 UTC