Re: Proposed text for issue 155

oh, geez, no - I see how it can be taken that way, how about:

  As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not all parts of a
  SOAP message may be intented for the ultimate SOAP receiver. The
  actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the
  SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is targeted.

-Dug


Jacek Kopecky <jacek@systinet.com> on 12/04/2001 02:45:03 PM

To:   Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc:   <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Subject:  Re: Proposed text for issue 155



 Dug,
 just a question for clarification:
 Are you proposing here that the absence of the actor attribute
equals the proposed semantics of the ".../any" actor?

                   Jacek Kopecky

                   Senior Architect, Systinet (formerly Idoox)
                   http://www.systinet.com/



On Thu, 29 Nov 2001, Doug Davis wrote:

 > Section 4.2.2 states:
 >   As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not all parts of a
 >   SOAP message may be intended for the ultimate SOAP receiver. SOAP
 >   defines an actor attribute information item that can be used to
 >   indicate the SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is
 >   targeted.
 >
 > I propose to change this to:
 >   As described in 2 SOAP Message Exchange Model, not all parts of a
 >   SOAP message may be intented for the ultimate SOAP receiver. The
 >   actor attribute information item is to be used to indicate the
 >   SOAP node at which a particular SOAP header block is targeted if
 >   targeting of that header block is desired.
 >
 > Note 1: The "2" is a typo in the version of the spec I have :-)
 > Note 2: This entire piece of text might be removed when issues
 >         153 and 160 are resolved.
 >
 > -Dug
 >