W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2001

Re: Comments on SOAP Protocol Binding Framework

From: Christopher Ferris <chris.ferris@sun.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 08:59:34 -0500
Message-ID: <3C0CD6C6.3030103@sun.com>
To: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
CC: xml-dist-app@w3.org
+1 to the second comment.

w/r/t the first comment, not sure where in the spec
this should be placed...

Cheers,

Chris

Doug Davis wrote:

> Just a few comments...
> ----
> The definition of features should be moved outside of this
> document and into the spec itself.  To have features mentioned
> only w.r.t. bindings and then to say features could include
> things like "correlation" which might not have anything to do
> with bindings could lead people to assume a link between the
> two that does not need to exists.  Features (or as I prefer
> them to be called "extensions") are not necessarily related
> to the binding (could be - but not required).
> ----
> "It is up to the communicating nodes to decide how best to
> express particular features".
> This isn't correct - the binding specification decides how best
> to express the features - the communicating nodes decide which
> binding to use - but once the binding is picked the nodes
> are not free to express features in some random fashion.
> ----
> 
> -Dug
> 
> 
Received on Tuesday, 4 December 2001 09:03:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 22:28:13 UTC