RE: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review

Agreed. Will do.
Thx
Nilo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:moreau@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 5:30 AM
> To: Nilo Mitra (EMX)
> Cc: 'xml-dist-app@w3.org'
> Subject: Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available 
> for review
> 
> 
> Nilo,
> 
> There is no dispute here, I think you're right showing an example
> other than (the usal (boring)) RPC. I am simply suggesting that,
> in your text, you indicate this could also be done with RPC, but
> that there is no real need here, so that the people who know SOAP
> only through RPC understand there are other valid usage patterns.
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> "Nilo Mitra (EMX)" wrote:
> 
> >         * In the same example, be more explicit as well about
> >      why you choose
> >           not to use RPC.
> >      NM: Don't know if this was a real design choice. It was
> >      based on the need to meet a comment on the previous draft
> >      that the examples not be too RPC-ish. I thought this was a
> >      part of a plausible document exchange oriented scenario
> >      which could be built upon throughout the document.
> >
>