W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > December 2001

Re: SOAP 1.2 Part 0: Primer Editor's draft available for review

From: Jean-Jacques Moreau <moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 11:30:09 +0100
Message-ID: <3C0B5431.C49077A4@crf.canon.fr>
To: "Nilo Mitra (EMX)" <Nilo.Mitra@am1.ericsson.se>
CC: "'xml-dist-app@w3.org'" <xml-dist-app@w3.org>

There is no dispute here, I think you're right showing an example
other than (the usal (boring)) RPC. I am simply suggesting that,
in your text, you indicate this could also be done with RPC, but
that there is no real need here, so that the people who know SOAP
only through RPC understand there are other valid usage patterns.


"Nilo Mitra (EMX)" wrote:

>         * In the same example, be more explicit as well about
>      why you choose
>           not to use RPC.
>      NM: Don't know if this was a real design choice. It was
>      based on the need to meet a comment on the previous draft
>      that the examples not be too RPC-ish. I thought this was a
>      part of a plausible document exchange oriented scenario
>      which could be built upon throughout the document.
Received on Monday, 3 December 2001 05:30:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:17 UTC