W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > April 2001

Re: [soapbuilders] question re: namespace hierarchies

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@zolera.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:14:24 -0400
Message-ID: <3AE0DEF0.1A949434@zolera.com>
To: soapbuilders@yahoogroups.com
CC: dick@8760.com, xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Certainly, the reason is that the consequence of the ebXML spec defining
> the relative URI "ebxml" is that this implies that all URIs ending in
> "ebxml" identify the same thing (the contents being an ebXML message).

Well, that's more theoretical than a cause for real-world concern, isn't
it?
I mean, since there is a binding endpoint involved, perhaps with WSDL or
an ebXML collaboration agreement, that specifies host port and URL where
the HTTP POST is being directed.  Considering that more complete
context, I'm hard pressed to see any fault with a relative URI here.
	/r$
Received on Friday, 20 April 2001 21:10:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:59:00 GMT