RE: Issues with Packaging Application Payloads from S. Mike Dierken on 2000-10-26 (xml-dist-app@w3.org from October 2000)

From: S. Mike Dierken <mike@knownow.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 12:02:25 -0700
To: <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <ENEILMMLEJBPJPFHPJGGEEAFCGAA.mike@knownow.com>

> It is also not acceptable
> for the "business payload" to be attached as a URI.  This would require
the
> receiver of the message to have secured access to that URI and for the URI
to
> contain only the applicable documents.  This would impose a burden of
establishing
> and maintaining a multitude of individually secure areas, communicating
access
> instructions, etc.
>
> --Mike
>
Well, what if the URI references a portion of the message/package itself?
The multipart/related spec has a 'cid:' and 'mid:' URI that references
content within the message.


Mike

Received on Thursday, 26 October 2000 15:01:39 UTC