- From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 16:22:23 -0500
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@akamai.com>, XML Distributed Applications List <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote: > Can we assume that every XP service has an identifiable URI? It's been a fundamental premise in my thinking, except for the case where two parties have prior agreement. > If so, perhaps > we should consider requiring this? Depends what we mean by "requiring". > .... it would also be good to require the envelope to identify > the URI, ........ I think it would be good to require the envelope to *support* identification of the URI. I don't necessarily think that the URI should be a required element. -- Ray Denenberg Library of Congress rden@loc.gov 202-707-5795
Received on Tuesday, 21 November 2000 16:22:12 UTC