Re: XP Service URIs

Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Can we assume that every XP service has an identifiable URI?

It's been a fundamental premise in my thinking, except for the case where two
parties have prior agreement.

> If so, perhaps
> we should consider requiring this?

Depends what we mean by "requiring".

> .... it would also be good to require the envelope to identify
> the URI, ........

I think it would be good to require the envelope to *support* identification of
the URI. I don't necessarily think that the URI should be a required element.


--
Ray Denenberg
Library of Congress
rden@loc.gov
202-707-5795