W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > November 2000

Re: DR 203: rewording?

From: Octav Chipara <ochipara@cse.unl.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 23:28:09 -0600
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.4.05.10011152326380.5458774-100000@cse.unl.edu>


On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, MOREAU Jean-Jacques wrote:

> Considering [1] and [2], I suggest we drop this requirement altogether
> (out of scope).
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
I tend to agree because there is no reason to worry about the binding
between the content of the message and the application inside XP. That is
the job of the application and XP.


- Octav

> [1] Stuart Williams/DR 201, DR202 and DR203: Programming Language
> Bindings/ Tues 20:02 GMT+1
> [2]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2000Nov/0051.html
> 
> Original text:
>               The XML Protocol will guarantee that RPC messages
>               that encode parameters and results using the default
>               encoding for the base set of data types will be valid
> for
>               any conformant binding of the RPC conventions. "Valid"
>               in this context means that the semantics of the call
>               should remain identical, irrespective of the programming
> 
>               language or object system used by the caller or
> receiver.
> 
Received on Thursday, 16 November 2000 00:28:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT