At least I think it should say SHOULD and not MUST. One might discuss whether it is appropriate to use uppercase MUST/SHOULD/MAY as these terms are normally used for describing requirements in the specification - not requirements to the specification itself, see [1] Henrik [1] http://www.normos.org/ietf/rfc/rfc2119.txt > This should be distilled to a straight requirement for > modularity, rather > than going at it by way of easy of use, etc.Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 18:55:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:57 GMT