RE: [DR 307] : Complex wording.

• From: Anderson, William L <WAnderson@crt.xerox.com>
• Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 12:07:28 -0500
• To: "'RUELLAN Herve'" <ruellan@crf.canon.fr>, xml-dist-app@w3.org
• Message-ID: <BF85F885643CD21188230008C756293502E1E897@crte128-2.wrc.xerox.com>

I don't understand what is meant by "organisational boundaries." Examples,
please?

Bill Anderson

> -----Original Message-----
> From: RUELLAN Herve [mailto:ruellan@crf.canon.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:12 AM
> To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
> Subject: [DR 307] : Complex wording.
> 
> 
> I find the current wording of DR307 rather complex. So I would suggest
> the following rewording:
> 
> XP MUST be suitable for widespread use across organisational 
> boundaries
> in support of the application use cases supplied elsewhere in this
> document. This implies making the XP specification simple to 
> understand
> and to implement correctly (see also DR301, DR301a, DR303).
> 
> Hervé Ruellan.
> 

Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2000 12:08:01 UTC