W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Update of SOAP entry in protocol matrix

From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2000 04:36:01 -0400
To: Henrik Frystyk Nielsen <frystyk@microsoft.com>
Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org, David Turner <dturner@microsoft.com>
Message-ID: <20000514043601.B3709@w3.org>
On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 05:59:05PM -0700, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote:

Henrik, et al. Sorry I took so long to get to this.

> After the SOAP submission as a W3C NOTE, on the page
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix
>     @(#) $Id: 29-XML-protocol-matrix.html,v 1.16 2000/05/09 20:23:53
> eric Exp $
> 
> could you please update the SOAP entry as follows:
> 
> * The link to the spec should point to [1]
check

> * Under "organization", the names should be the ones listed on the W3C
> submission request [2] as submitters
yup

> * "Authors" should be the ones listed on [1]
roger

> * "Status" should be "W3C NOTE" (if you mean document status - I don't
> understand the term "deployed"/"coded")
yessir (it was meant to help peope who said "is anyone using foo?"

> * There are now two namespaces and two schemas - one of each for the
> SOAP envelope [3] and for the SOAP encoding rules [4] respectively.
i'm right with you

> * The example should be updated (you can take a new one from the W3C
> Note) and I would suggest removing the HTTP stuff as it is not used in
> any of the other examples that I believe also may be using HTTP or add
> it to them all where it makes sense.
done

> Thanks!
sure thing!
-- 
-eric

(eric@w3.org)
Received on Sunday, 14 May 2000 04:36:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:56 GMT