On Wed, May 10, 2000 at 05:59:05PM -0700, Henrik Frystyk Nielsen wrote: Henrik, et al. Sorry I took so long to get to this. > After the SOAP submission as a W3C NOTE, on the page > > http://www.w3.org/2000/03/29-XML-protocol-matrix > @(#) $Id: 29-XML-protocol-matrix.html,v 1.16 2000/05/09 20:23:53 > eric Exp $ > > could you please update the SOAP entry as follows: > > * The link to the spec should point to [1] check > * Under "organization", the names should be the ones listed on the W3C > submission request [2] as submitters yup > * "Authors" should be the ones listed on [1] roger > * "Status" should be "W3C NOTE" (if you mean document status - I don't > understand the term "deployed"/"coded") yessir (it was meant to help peope who said "is anyone using foo?" > * There are now two namespaces and two schemas - one of each for the > SOAP envelope [3] and for the SOAP encoding rules [4] respectively. i'm right with you > * The example should be updated (you can take a new one from the W3C > Note) and I would suggest removing the HTTP stuff as it is not used in > any of the other examples that I believe also may be using HTTP or add > it to them all where it makes sense. done > Thanks! sure thing! -- -eric (eric@w3.org)Received on Sunday, 14 May 2000 04:36:05 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 08:41:40 GMT