W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > April 2004

Re: Element sets, schemas, and record syntaxes

From: Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 15:33:56 -0400
Message-ID: <16f201c42c8e$953938f0$849c938c@lib.loc.gov>
To: "ZIG" <www-zig@w3.org>

I want to close the loop on the discussion below -- not specifically
about element sets, etc., but rather how one can discover these sort
of agreements (as Mike points out was difficult).

On the Z39.50 maintenance agency page http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/
there is a link to a page now called  "Related Specifications"  (which
I think we'll rename "extensions/Implementor Agreements").   On that
page is included "Implementor Agreements".  Currently included is the
agreement about requesting xml records.

The intent is to list here any agreements that extend Z39.50-2003,
without breaking them down by clarification, commentary, amendment,
etc.


--Ray


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <rden@loc.gov>
To: "ZIG" <www-zig@w3.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Element sets, schemas, and record syntaxes


>
> > > I think its wrong to say element sets are part of schemas.
> >
> > I'm sorry; I'm not going to argue either way, but I think this
> > arrangment (for XML only) is a done deal.  (That said, a few
> moments'
> > grovelling around the Maintenance Agency site doesn't turn up the
> > Implementor Agreement/clarification/amendment/whatever it was.)
>
> See
> http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/agree/request-xml.html
>
>
> (Yes I know, there no easy way to "grovel" to this. I'll fix that.)
>
> --Ray
>
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2004 15:34:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:23 GMT