W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > March 2003

RE: NORZIG proposed new bib-1 Use attributes

From: Jonathan Rowell <bigrat18@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 12:30:30 +0100
To: Liv.A.Holm@jbi.hio.no
Cc: www-zig@w3.org
Message-ID: <F88mQVwlytDNX2XSi0D000107b9@hotmail.com>

Hi Liv!

The message from Sebastian Hammar :-

In DanZIG, we're also not using the attribute set architecture specifically. 
However, we did choose to create a new attribute set (Dan-1) for attributes 
of specific national relevance, rather than moving everything into Bib-1. 
This was based on the observation that pretty much all targets on the Danish 
market were capable of supporting multiple attribute sets when pushed.

Can you say something about your thoughts in this regard?

--Sebastian



This would also interest me, since I have to point my Zoom client at NoMarc, 
DanMarc, UniMarc and MAB servers. Also can one have access to your data for 
testing purposes?


Jonathan

BiBer GmbH

>From: Liv Aasa Holm <Liv.A.Holm@jbi.hio.no>
>To: "barbara.shuh" <barbara.shuh@nlc-bnc.ca>, Mike Taylor 
><mike@indexdata.com>
>CC: www-zig <www-zig@w3.org>
>Subject: RE: NORZIG proposed new bib-1 Use attributes
>Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 09:55:27 +0100
>
>
>We (NORZIG) are definitely on the list and we have worked in this area for
>more than 20 years now (network protocol area).  All our systems do have
>z39.50 modules and some have had implementations for 10-15 years.  And, 
>yes,
>we do use bib-1, we have no imediate plans of switching to bib-2, AND we
>need the extra USE values proposed.
>
>Liv A. Holm
>


_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
Received on Thursday, 20 March 2003 06:30:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:23 GMT