W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > August 2003

Semantic qualifiers in the attribute architecture

From: Alan Kent <ajk@mds.rmit.edu.au>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 09:15:45 +1000
To: ZIG <www-zig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20030825231545.GE19492@io.mds.rmit.edu.au>


A hopefully easy question. In the attribute architecture, is there
any expectation to use 'complex' in an attribute list for the semantic
qualifier attribute type? In AttributeElement in the Z39.50 ASN.1,
you can specify an optional OID, an attribute type (integer), and
an attributeValue. The attribute value is a choice of a numeric
(which most people use) and 'complex' which is a list of StringOrNumeric
plus an optional sequence of semanticAction values.

I believe AA semantic qualifiers are unrelated to the 'complex'
bit (with its 'semanticAction') in AttributeElement. Is this correct?



ps: Ray - I have been getting mail OK and not out of order - at least
not that I noticed. Could it be some mail gateway closer to you?)
Received on Monday, 25 August 2003 19:14:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:26:05 UTC