W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-zig@w3.org > March 2002

Re: back to character encoding

From: Ray Denenberg <rden@loc.gov>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 13:38:12 -0500
Message-ID: <3C8F9C94.D74B8BE8@loc.gov>
To: zig <www-zig@w3.org>

"LeVan,Ralph" wrote:

> Yes!  It should apply to the OctetString version of Term.  (It does in my
> server.)

How do you interpret the character set negotiation definition to apply to
OctetString?

Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 13:37:35 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: LeVan,Ralph: "RE: back to character encoding"
Previous message: Mark Reichert: "Re: character encoding ISO 2022"
In reply to: LeVan,Ralph: "RE: back to character encoding"
Next in thread: LeVan,Ralph: "RE: back to character encoding"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 October 2009 06:12:22 GMT