Re: ZNG dicussion

> > Perhaps we could build a list and go through each in turn to see how
> > appropriate or necessary each is?  How each adds to the
> > specification.  Everyone says that there's a large number of
> > concepts, and there definitely is, perhaps we could get something
> > definite to knock around?

> This is an interesting idea.  Are you volunteering?  :-)

Here's my attempt, from the 1995 specification:

* Sessions
* (A)PDUs
* ASN
* BER
* Attributes
* Attribute Sets
* Attribute Types
* OIDs
* Query Types
* Segmentation
* Diagnostics
* Authentication/Access Control
* Resultsets
* Schemas
* Tagsets
* Element Sets
* Record Syntaxes
* GRS
* Term Lists
* Profiles
* General terminology. (target, origin, Z-Association, O-Machine, etc)

Rob

-- 
      ,'/:.          Rob Sanderson (azaroth@liverpool.ac.uk)
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Syrinnia:  telnet:  syrinnia.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.                WWW:  http://syrinnia.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I