Re: usage of block-progression-dimension.minimum

Thanks for your answer Ken.
I was using Apache FOP 0.95 for which there was a known issue (
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638) fixed in FOP 1.0.
I have tried with this new version but the behavior is exactly the same
that the previous version...

Lanz

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 11:18 PM, G. Ken Holman <
gkholman@cranesoftwrights.com> wrote:

> At 2012-07-10 20:54 +0200, Lanz wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to create a block that has a minimum heigt of 37mm by using
>> 'block-progression-dimension.**minimum' attribute in this way :
>>
>
> You are using it correctly.  I ran your example verbatim and Antenna House
> gave me a box 37mm high.  When I added more text lines than fit, the box
> height extended down to accommodate it.  When I changed the box minimum
> height and removed the extra lines, the box turned out as expected.
>
>
>  but it does not work, when the content is not long enough the dimension
>> of the block is less than 37 mm
>>
>
> That sounds like a bug in whatever processor you are using.
>
> I hope this helps, if only to tell you what you are doing does produce
> what you expect in my environment.
>
> . . . . . . . . . Ken
>
> --
> Public XSLT, XSL-FO, UBL and code list classes in Europe -- Oct 2012
> Contact us for world-wide XML consulting and instructor-led training
> Free 5-hour lecture: http://www.CraneSoftwrights.**com/links/udemy.htm<http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/links/udemy.htm>
> Crane Softwrights Ltd.            http://www.CraneSoftwrights.**com/f/<http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/f/>
> G. Ken Holman                   mailto:gkholman@**CraneSoftwrights.com<gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
> Google+ profile: https://plus.google.com/**116832879756988317389/about<https://plus.google.com/116832879756988317389/about>
> Legal business disclaimers:    http://www.CraneSoftwrights.**com/legal<http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal>
>
>
>