W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xsl-fo@w3.org > December 2010

Re: fo:instream-foreign-object [Was: 6.2 in xsl-fo 1.1]

From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:38:14 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTinAfJP+eZjHi=Qhx0Eu+KsdkTrevgZfrherbVHx@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Graham <Tony.Graham@menteithconsulting.com>
Cc: www-xsl-fo@w3.org
On 10 December 2010 15:19, Tony Graham
<Tony.Graham@menteithconsulting.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 09 2010 11:29:00 +0000, dave.pawson@gmail.com wrote:
> ...
>> Another oddity?
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#fo_instream-foreign-object
> Can you change the subject line or start a new thread for a new topic?

Yes, will do.

>> The content model of 'any' would suffice. Without the <eg/>
>> child it requires special treatment?
> How to you reconcile 'ANY' with "The fo:instream-foreign-object flow
> object has a child from a non-XSL namespace." (especially given that the
> "Contents" subsections are using XML content model syntax)?

Agreed. The xml content model doesn't work very well does it.

It would require a definition... as the remainder seem to have.

An issue would be the use of the 'string' any vs a keyword any.

OK, An exception.


Dave Pawson
Docbook FAQ.
Received on Friday, 10 December 2010 15:38:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:58:33 UTC